Search for: "Watson v. Davis"
Results 1 - 20
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
High Court agreed with Davis and Watson in July 2015. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 2:56 pm
Eugene Davis, Judge Jerry E. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:42 pm
Davis, 2016 U.S. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:09 am
In this week’s case (Eggleston v. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 5:46 am
The decision in Watson clearly leaves the communications data model in the new legislation on shaky legal ground. [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm
The two lead claimants, David Davis MP and Tom Watson MP, were represented by Liberty. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
Arkansas Law Review Examines the Lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
17 Feb 2007, 7:14 am
Watson v. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 3:38 am
David Davis MP, Tom Watson MP and Others v the Secretary of State for the Home Department Today, the High Court found against the Government in David Davis’s and Tom Watson’s joint legal challenge to the Government’s emergency surveillance legislation. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 7:57 pm
Davis won in State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2007, 6:28 am
Watson, 2007 U.S. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 416, 96 S. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 4:04 am
This led both Tele2 and Watson (along with a Conservative MP, David Davis, who withdrew his name when he became a cabinet minister) to challenge their respective national data retention regimes, essentially arguing that such regimes were incompatible with the standards set down in Digital Rights Ireland. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2019, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
This Update focuses on the Federal Trade Commission’s (“FTC”) and the Department of Justice Antitrust Division’s (“DOJ”) antitrust enforcement activity over the last year under this Executive Order’s direction.2 For further details on the Executive Order, please see Davis Polk’s prior Client Update regarding issuance of the Executive Order.3 FTC and DOJ have been conducting intensive merger and conduct investigations FTC Chair Lina Khan was… [read post]
20 Oct 2019, 1:27 pm
I agree that the criteria in Ladd v Marshall are not absolute rules and must give way to the interests of justice, but this case is not on all fours, nor even close, to Davis v Wiggett . [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:21 pm
Rule — Sabey Rule LLP, KelownaUsing Unjust Enrichment as a Remedy in Estate Litigationcurrent state of the lawwhen is this remedy most effective to pleadelements of unjust enrichmentjoint family ventures after Kerr v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 12:56 pm
CORE v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
Watson Eastern District of Tennessee at KnoxvilleR. [read post]
